@Casinoslcohol @tekphloyd @wwdc I just checked: my setup is over APFS, but I believe it can be done over Samba shares too.
@Casinoslcohol @tekphloyd @wwdc I’ve been doing it for years with great success.
@Casinoslcohol @tekphloyd @wwdc I don’t think the file system matters. And I think it’s even over a Samba share.
@Casinoslcohol @tekphloyd @wwdc I think you may be operating on out of date information. I do it right now to a Synology NAS with out of the box support. Others support it too.
@Casinoslcohol @tekphloyd @wwdc TimeMachine already supports a NAS?
@fortescue Ah. For when I’m having trouble sleeping… gotcha!
@fortescue /me looks up Urban dictionary.
@fortescue @phocks Extremely well done, you should be very proud of your part in this.
Since it's night again, and I'm getting ranty as usual: someone needs to write a paper entitled "Discord Considered Harmful".
It's one of the most annoying antipatterns I've seen in both software projects and communities like #hackerspace - centering community around a group chat (Discord, Slack, Telegram groups, and yes - IRC), in lieu of a proper forum *and maintaining documentation*.
Such software is not suitable for long-term knowledge maintenance, and excludes people who can't track discussions live.
So you know how Linux systems letter SCSI disks sda, sdb, sdc, sdd, etc... and if you manage to get more than 26 disks attached to a system, it rolls over from sdz to sdaa.
I just watched a customer list the disks on a server, and it goes up to sdahs.
So I guess that answers the question about what happens after you attach 702 disks to Linux. It rolls over from sdzz to sdaaa. 🤯